Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01723 363636 now.
 
 
Wednesday, 20th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scarborough Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Mum's fury over school rejection - COMMENT ON THIS STORY



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 July 2008
A MOTHER has vowed to do "whatever it takes" to have her two children attend the same secondary school – despite her daughter being turned away from St Augustine's.
Emma Fishburn's son Connor, 12, attends the school in Sandybed Lane, Scarborough, and she applied for her daughter Alexandra, 10, to join him in September.

However, despite an appeal, she has been unsuccessful and was allocated Raincliffe School in Lady Edith's Drive.

She says she will not, "under any circumstances", be sending Alex- andra to Raincliffe.

Mrs Fishburn, 31, of Trafalgar Street West, said: "I just cannot believe what has happened. I was told that children who have brothers or sisters at the school would have a priority, but this is clearly not the case.

"I did not expect there to be any problems at all.

"Alexandra is really upset and just will not go to Raincliffe. She is not a Catholic, but I was told that doesn't make a difference. I cannot afford to home school her so I am prepared to keep her off school. I will do whatever it takes to have my two children at the same school."

Mrs Fishburn said her daughter has an eating disorder which is triggered when she is upset and unhappy.

She said: "The doctor wrote a letter to the appeal panel explaining that a move to Raincliffe could trigger the disorder, but that has made no difference. It is terrible."

Another mum, Caroline Brookes, won her fight to have her 10-year-old son Soony, who is a Buddhist, attend St Augustine's.

She was furious after her son was initially turned away from the town's only faith secondary school but an appeal before an independent panel was successful.

Mrs Fishburn was one of 27 families whose appeal was unsuccessful, with only four winning.

Tracey Morris is also wanting answers after her son Kyle failed to get into St Augustine's, which her daughter Adele, 14, already attends.

Mrs Morris, of Church Street, said: "He has been allocated Raincliffe. It is just not the right school for him. He does not know anyone else who is going there and it will be really hard for us as I will have one child at St Augustine's and another at Raincliffe. It is ridiculous."

In the St Augustine's admission criteria children baptised Catholics who have brothers and sisters at the school are given priority, followed by non-catholic chidren with brothers of sisters at the school.

Headteacher Roger Cannon said: "We had 31 appeals and four were successful. It is always a difficult time and we are working on expanding the school so we are able to welcome more children."

What do you think? You can leave your comments below.

The full article contains 463 words and appears in Scarborough Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 July 2008 8:53 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

English like wot she is meant to be spoke,

10/07/2008 11:51:24
I just HATE these lovey dovey pics of Mums pawing their kids in the paper. Leave her alone! Poor girl has to go to school again sometime you know...

Unless I missed it, no reason given was why this girl should go to St Ogg's in preference to any of the other kids whose parents want them there.

And threatening to keep kid out of school until she gets her way... pathetic.

Utter selfishness on the part of a pushy mother, nothing else.
2

The_Voice,

10/07/2008 13:24:07
I laughed out loud at the picture. It looks like the pair of them have been told the sky is about to fall down and all human life as we know it will come to an end. Then I scrolled down to type a very similar comment to the one already written.

Everyone has a school preference. Some get their wish, others dont. Most dont then turn to the press in a poor attempt to whip up some sympathy. I feel for the chuld - what kind of parent would keep their child off school entirely - thus doing more harm than good, most likely - in an attempt to draw some attention to their 'plight'?

Shocking.
3

Mike Firth,

Scarborough 10/07/2008 14:10:05
I agree with other commentators here. This is about convenience not the kids. Its about manipulation of the media and essentially stories like this sells newsprint.
4

love that benny,

10/07/2008 14:18:20
i have to laugh, not so long back when i attended oggys we were the laughing stock of scarborough becuase we were catholics, now it seems because grades have picked up everyone wants to send there kids there, how the times have changed.
5

time to speak,

SCARBOROUGH 11/07/2008 00:45:00
I along with my wife and children have been part of the of the roman catholic family since birth, through baptism and first holy communion. It is a long commitment to a sometimes challenging and somewhat disciplined faith. Why oh why are we allowing 'non-believers' to take up places in schools for OUR children. They want it because St Augustines is now one of the best performing disciplined schools in, not just Scarborough, but probably the county. I must admit I would be horrified if my children were to be allocated any other school. St Augustines? No bullying No drugs No knives - why? because it is a well run school strictly adhering to the good morals in society with good discipline than ensures the children stay on the right track. It amazes me that parents suddenly think they can just put their kids in the best school, claiming human rights for their kids to avoid Raincliffe. You chose your religious views for that of yourself and your child...it wasn't catholic so go to another school please. Your morals and beliefs are not that of the catholic faith and it can do nothing but harm to the catholic children at the school when you suddenly cause disharmony by claiming another human right that your child shouldnt be going to assembly or studying RE because they are buddhist etc etc.
Mr Canon - I would support you in all appeals to keep the students at St Augustines true catholics. The school should be welcoming baptised catholics true to the faith only, especially our local polish community who are exactly that and need the extra and excellent support your school provides. You cant keep drawing the line, etch it and stick to it. Catholics only!!
PS Im not polish. As for Ms FISHBURN, transfer her son to Raincliffe so they can be together there if that is her main objection.
6

Enquiries@raincliffehotel.co.uk,

scarborough 11/07/2008 10:28:37
I have to agree with most of all of the above posts,smile and look sickenly sweet does not work,well it never did for me,(hmmm)
a school is there,you must use it,like someone has already pointed out,no reasons are offerd,its against the law to keep your child from school,or are you going to be the scarborough one,you would have to wait a long time in clink,thats if your expecting a support group,
my school was great,it was approved,i can only add up at night,thats because it was a night school,like the above story,a joke.
7

A name thats not in use!,

11/07/2008 15:00:35
I'm afraid i cant agree with all the above. I'm wondering how many of you have had more than one child who are at different schools! Can you imagine how awkward it would be. What if parents evenings, concerts, sports events or school fundraising events happened to fall on the same days which i am sure in most cases it does. How would the parent/parents sort that out?? which childs school would they decide to visit!!??? I went through the same thing years ago.I had one child at graham school, one allocated to another secondary school and a five year old ready to start primary school in the september. That would have meant i would have 3 children at three different schools. Whilst living in a village outside of scarborough the eldest was in the graham school catchment are. A few years later we moved to another village where once the school bus used to pick up pupils but then changed its route which meant i had to use the car to get him to school. My second son was then allocated to a different school in the september and my youngest was just starting at primary school in the village. So three children at 3 different schools! Three different uniforms and 3 different timetables to adhere too. There was no way i could get all three too school on time without having got one there an hour or so before he should have been there. Yes i could have taken the eldest out of graham and moved him to the other allocated school but in my eyes he was at the better school. (he in fact left graham with 9 GCSE's and went on to university where he achieved a first with honours in marine biology.)I decided to go to the appeal council to try and get my second son into graham school and i was lucky enough to win my case. If i had not been able to send him to the same school as my eldest i too would have been upset and angry and it would also have been an uproot for my eldest to have to change schools. I think that all schools should give priority to siblings of existing pupils and the peopl
8

A name thats not in use!,

11/07/2008 16:38:51
i think that all schools should give priority to siblings of existing pupils the people who think parents are just moaning for the sake of it regading having their children at the same schools should just try and put themselves in their position before chastising them. Another benefit of having your children at the same schools is recycling of uniforms especially if the children are the same sex. All or parts of the uniforms can be passed down. Children grow quickly and uniforms are expensive! And yes there may be convenience reasons for parents to want their children at the same school but they are probably convenient reasons that are in the childs interest and not just the parents. So i am sorry but most of the pompous commments made by the above people i personally think are pathetic and are not in the childrens best interest. I bet if you lot above were faced with the same dilemma you would be the first ones to book an appeal!!!!!!!
9

A name thats not in use!,

11/07/2008 17:13:57
#5 This is the most racist comment i have read in a long time. and the most stupid. What a load of BULL!! I could say that we shouldnt let catholics into 'our' schools but as 'your' schools are in the minority catholics have to be able to go to other schools, voluntary i would think as well!!! As for your comment about no bullying, no drugs and no knives at st agustines!! You must have your head in the clouds or somwehere very 'dark'!!!Every school has bullying drugs and knives including st agustines probably more so i wouldnt be surprised because of its 'somewhat disciplined faith'! Your words not mine! Yes we choose our religious views but you lot usually make your kids continue in your faith even if they dont want to!!! Your more likely to be pushy parents and i bet you would have a real paddy if your children couldnt go to the school of 'your' choice. Hell if thats the comments of a churchgoer i'm glad i'm not a part of any faith!!!! True catholics!! I bet there are a lot of 'true' catholics who are also ashamed of and angry at your comments!!
10

A name thats not in use!,

11/07/2008 17:15:54
#1 Your comments regarding the photo. I would think it was the reporter and photographer who made them pose like that dont you? I am sure the mother would much rather have portrayed her true feelings of how she really felt! Very Angry i would say!!!
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.