Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Stay in Scarborough

Goodbye Wave

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 July 2007
A CONTROVERSIAL £240,000 sea-front art project is set to be scrapped after organisers failed to raise the required cash.
The future of the Wave – a giant metal sculpture, which was intended to stretch 275ft around Castle Headland with 21 curved metal fins – will be discussed at a meeting of Scarborough Council's Cabinet next week.

Council officers are now urging the project, which has a shortfall of around £165,000, be scrapped and alternative projects explored.

A public arts group chose the sculpture in 2004 but it has been dogged by problems including spiralling costs and divided public opinion.

And opponents feel the existing funding would be better spent on a more appropriate artwork such as a memorial to disasters at sea.

Cllr Peter Popple said the decision had always been on the cards and raising almost £250,000 had proved impractical. He said: "I thought it was bound to happen. Eighty per cent of people in Scarborough must have been against it.

"We need a more appropriate artwork, something that commemorates the fishing industry or the fishermen who have drowned at sea. I think this is an excellent move."

Scarborough's Mayor, Cllr Janet Jefferson, who represents the Castle ward, said the proposal to scrap it represented the feelings of people in her ward and agreed a more appropriate artwork should be chosen – such as a memorial to the 1954 RNLI disaster."

When the project was originally proposed the estimated cost was £96,000 but costs rocketed to an estimated £242,000. The council set a deadline to source private sector funding by the end of March but it proved unsuccessful.

The Wave was intended to be installed in December 2004 when the Marine Drive coastal defence works were completed. But delays in the project and problems raising some of the private sponsorship needed meant a contract with designers Eaton Waygood Associates was not signed until July 2005, effectively pushing up the costs.

The scheme was criticised as "an insult" by Norma Barratt who lost her daughter and two grandchildren after they were swept out to sea from a slipway in the North Bay in March 2005.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 July 2007 7:25 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

Thewick,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 09:21:42
Just as I was going to offer to pay for it!

Ah well, perhaps I could sponsor trips to that other wonderful arts initiative, the star map that has replaced the South Bay pool. For some reason, the few people who visit it at present seem to be bemused by it, so clearly we need to inspire some sort of mass participation exercise.

Incidentally, is the feature that looks like a bodged repair to a crack exactly what it appears to be, or does it help you to locate Betelgeuse, if you lie down with your nose at the end at midnight.

As I recall, this lonely installation cost about £400,000 of public money - half from Scarborough Council and half from one of these quangos that were set up to pay fees to the government's pals.

Still, it's better than leaving it in the pockets of old age pensioners or working families - they'd only waste it on fripperies like staying warm or feeding the children.

2

Thewick,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 09:22:07
Just as I was going to offer to pay for it!

Ah well, perhaps I could sponsor trips to that other wonderful arts initiative, the star map that has replaced the South Bay pool. For some reason, the few people who visit it at present seem to be bemused by it, so clearly we need to inspire some sort of mass participation exercise.

Incidentally, is the feature that looks like a bodged repair to a crack exactly what it appears to be, or does it help you to locate Betelgeuse, if you lie down with your nose at the end at midnight.

As I recall, this lonely installation cost about £400,000 of public money - half from Scarborough Council and half from one of these quangos that were set up to pay fees to the government's pals.

Still, it's better than leaving it in the pockets of old age pensioners or working families - they'd only waste it on fripperies like staying warm or feeding the children.

3

Thewick,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 09:22:31
Just as I was going to offer to pay for it!

Ah well, perhaps I could sponsor trips to that other wonderful arts initiative, the star map that has replaced the South Bay pool. For some reason, the few people who visit it at present seem to be bemused by it, so clearly we need to inspire some sort of mass participation exercise.

Incidentally, is the feature that looks like a bodged repair to a crack exactly what it appears to be, or does it help you to locate Betelgeuse, if you lie down with your nose at the end at midnight.

As I recall, this lonely installation cost about £400,000 of public money - half from Scarborough Council and half from one of these quangos that were set up to pay fees to the government's pals.

Still, it's better than leaving it in the pockets of old age pensioners or working families - they'd only waste it on fripperies like staying warm or feeding the children.

4

sheffield boy,

20/07/2007 10:12:10
Good news at last
Marine drives been ruined enough by the sea wall already !!
i wonder how much money has been wasted on this ??
5

Little Snuggler,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 12:06:36
Thank good ness for that - now let's see how the money will be wasted on the next hairbrain scheme?
6

Little Snuggler,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 12:07:13
Thank good ness for that - now let's see how the money will be wasted on the next hairbrain scheme?
7

Lady Taurus ,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 12:11:12
I'm delighted this wave has been cancelled. We have enough natural beauty to look at when walking around the Drive without that monstrosity being on show. Also the cost of maintaining this structure would have fallen on the rate payers of the borough.
8

Lady Taurus ,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 12:11:24
I'm delighted this wave has been cancelled. We have enough natural beauty to look at when walking around the Drive without that monstrosity being on show. Also the cost of maintaining this structure would have fallen on the rate payers of the borough.
9

Lady Taurus ,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 12:11:34
I'm delighted this wave has been cancelled. We have enough natural beauty to look at when walking around the Drive without that monstrosity being on show. Also the cost of maintaining this structure would have fallen on the rate payers of the borough.
10

Shrek,

Scarborough 20/07/2007 15:41:04
So long, nice idea but the reality was it was never going to be accepted or funded properly
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 

Today's Vote

Which England player performed best at the World Cup?
David James
Ashley Cole
Steven Gerard
Frank Lampard
James Milner
John Terry
Glen Johnson
Emile Heskey
Jermain Defoe
None of them


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.