Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Stay in Scarborough

Invitation goes out to run new casino - COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 March 2010
GAMBLING bosses are being invited to apply for a licence to run Scarborough's new casino.
Scarborough is one of eight local authorities in the UK to be granted the "small casino" licence – the others include Luton, Swansea, Torbay and Wolverhampton.

David Archer, the council's strategic director, said in a report to cabinet: "It is the view of the Casino Project Board that despite the current economic climate, Scarborough Council will benefit from being among the first to offer a 2005 Act casino licence.

"Anecdotal evidence from the casino industry suggests that there remains enough interest in the casino application process to support this decision and that to delay the process could see casino operators making investments in areas other than Scarborough."

The application process involves two stages – the first involves a regulatory procedure to ensure the applicants are suitably qualified, fit and able to run a casino of the type intended, while the second will involve the applicants being asked to present their casino development and regeneration proposals for the authority's area.

Delegates from eight gaming industry organisations attended an open day organised by Scarborough Council last September to see what the town could offer after being awarded a licence for a second "small casino" in town by central Government.

Scarborough Council considers itself one of the favourites in the race to open a small casino.

A small casino, as defined within the Gambling Act 2005, is deemed to be one with a minimum gaming area of 750 square metres with a maximum of 80 category B gaming machines, featuring a jackpot of up to £4,000.

Mr Archer said there were risks to the council's approach, adding: "By being among the first to commence the application process the council may find itself subjected to a legal challenge should a disappointed applicant contend that the process the licensing authority has adopted is not compliant with statute or Government guidance and/or on the basis of a perceived lack of transparency in the decision making process.

"Such risk of challenge arises as a result of the combination of the legislation and processes in respect of the 2005 Act casino premises licences being new and untested, and the nature of the high value business interests that are at stake."

He added: "At all times an emphasis has been placed on minimising the risk of any potential legal challenge whilst maximising the possible regeneration benefits derived from the process.

Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 10 March 2010 8:51 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

CrossgatesView,

10/03/2010 09:06:43
Putting aside the usual two for and against factors, good for jobs and bad for gambling addictions; surely things have moved on since 2005? Allegedly Grosvenor casinos are going to open in the old/new george hotel building, so here we are talking about a 3rd casino for the town, presumably bigger than the other two? Unless we are going to have a Las vegas type strip, then this one will need to be well out of the town centre, so presumably back to being part of the Sands project, yet Benchmark still seem to be moving along like an arthritic snail, so where would this casino go?
2

Idontbelieveit!,

Scarborough 10/03/2010 09:13:49
Casinos cater, luckily, for the minority. What Scarborough needs before any more casinos is an all weather water/leasure facility to cater for the majority. It should be where the now bulldozed old pool was and it needs building NOW! I rest my case.
3

Amaroo,

Scarborough 10/03/2010 09:48:29
A total aside from the subject.

Why is it that this subject is immediately made available to comment on.

But one of the main concerns in Scarborough, the Futurist which was reported on relevant to the survey etc done and indeed was headed to 'Comment On' remained a couple of days then removed and nobody could comment on.

It would appear there is very selective articles that we can comment on even when invited to do so.

The only comment to surface was a letter in the SEN.

There is something wrong within the SEN if it is so selective or sensitive.
4

heavensentmum,

10/03/2010 09:56:46
It will be four casinos, the Corrigans building has permission for one as well. It's all money, money, money.
I work all night,
I work all day, to pay the bills I have to pay,
Ain't it sad
And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me.
If there was It wouldn't be wasted at a casino.
5

A name thats not in use!,

10/03/2010 10:57:01
#2 Totaly agree with you. Why do we need another casino? Have enough problems with the one in St.Thomas Street already. Being kept awake till 6am in the morning with people in the smoke room who, as the alcohol goes down, the noise level rises!! All they do is say they will send the doormen in to ask customers to be quiet but the doormen dont even bother to tell people to quieten down! An all weather water/leisure facility is what scarborough needs for the towns residents as well as the holidaymakers. We dont need another casino!!
6

whitepudding,

10/03/2010 12:07:18
The Spa would make a lovely casino, and no neighbours to annoy either.
7

A name thats not in use!,

10/03/2010 12:16:53
#6 Perfect place!!
8

1007,

10/03/2010 12:24:19
#7 Perfect Place

Knipes Point.....
9

CrossgatesView,

10/03/2010 12:31:07
Perfect Place

The Town Hall
10

heavensentmum,

10/03/2010 12:40:00
Perfect place

Blackpool
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 

Today's Vote

Which England player performed best at the World Cup?
David James
Ashley Cole
Steven Gerard
Frank Lampard
James Milner
John Terry
Glen Johnson
Emile Heskey
Jermain Defoe
None of them


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.