Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01723 363636 now.
 
 
Monday, 21st July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scarborough Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Dog beach ban: proposal rejected



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 May 2008
A LAST-ditch bid to change dog control legislation on Scarborough's beaches was thrown out during a full council meeting.
Town Hall bosses originally wanted to extend the current ban – which runs from May 1 to September 30 – on certain parts of beaches in Scarborough and the other borough resorts.

However, following strong public opposition, a council report recommended that the proposal should be abandoned.

At this week's full council meeting deputy mayor and Eastfield ward councillor Brian O'Flynn suggested an amendment to the legislation.

He said that, for safety reasons, dogs should be kept on a lead while on the beach during March and April.

Cllr O'Flynn said: "A lot of people in Scarborough feel threatened and don't want to take their children on the beach."

In response, Cllr Lucy Haycock, of Seamer ward, said: "This is a big issue. I love dogs and have had them for 35 years but children need protecting. What we need is more enforcement wardens on the beach."

Newby ward councillor Brian Watson proposed that councillors should make no such amendment and vote to keep the original legislation.

He said: "I had more letters about the proposed dog ban than any other issue. People want to be able to let dogs off their leads and let them run about."

Cllr Geoff Evans, of Eastfield ward, said: "This is not about exercising dogs, this is about safety."

Following the discussion councillors voted against the proposed amendment and decided to follow recommendations not to change the current legislation.

Liz Blades, who lives in the Old Town, helped organise a petition, signed by nearly 5,000 people, against the proposed changes.

She said: "I'm glad to hear this final decision. There are so many responsible dog owners in Scarborough so this is good news for them."

The full article contains 305 words and appears in Scarborough Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 May 2008 7:56 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Amaroo,

Scarborough 15/05/2008 15:39:08
Common sense has come to the fore at last.

To Cllr. Geoff Evans I would say of course it is about people exercising their dogs. What a silly comment to make.

One gets the feeling that the likes of Cllr's. Flynn, Haycock are not beach walkers.

One has to accept that down the road of life there will be the odd mishap as sad as it maybe. Also there are indeed irresponsible dog owners. Those dog owners that allow their dog to cause a problem will hopefully be punished to the full etsxnet of the law. But you should not penalise every dog and its owner for the odd one that is a problem.
2

Z Victor One,

17/05/2008 17:29:21
"down the road of life there will be the odd mishap"

say a child being ripped to peaces by rabid dogs?

owner will say very sad hes a lovly dog never done this before the child must have provoke him

then ms blades and her cohorts will have nowt to say in public of course

a sad mishap
3

Harbour Bar,

18/05/2008 08:42:38
agree

some responsible dog owners yes but far to many iresponsible, the safety of kids more important

some responsible gun owners to but that dont mean we allow people to target practise on the beech does it???
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.