Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01723 363636 now.
 
 
Sunday, 20th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scarborough Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council pays out benefits of £35m a year - COMMENT ON THIS STORY



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 March 2008
SCARBOROUGH Council is dishing out more than £35 million a year in rent and council tax benefits.
And it is having to deal with around 150 new claims and 210 changes in circumstances each week.

The statistics are revealed in a report drawn up by Paul Cresswell, the council's head of financial services.

The aim of the report is to show whether the benefits services provide value for money in contributing to the overall aim to improve the council.

The benefits service pays out more than £25.6 million in rent allowance and £9.5 million in council tax benefit each year to around 11,500 people in the borough.

The cost for each claim is £58.80 compared with a national average of £67.80.

The latest survey also showed there had been an improvement in the speed of processing new claims, down from 27.74 days three years ago to 24.58 days.

Estimates show it could drop to under 20 days.

The time taken processing changes in circumstances has also improved from 19.61 days to 15.79 days and the latest results show this is dropping to under 12 days.

Mr Cresswell indicates how the council is working with other organisations and agencies to further improve the service and counteract fraud.

A joint take-up with the Citizens Advice Bureau resulted in £500,000 going in annual awards on all types of benefits, helping 123 people.

From next month the benefits service will face a new inspection and assessment regime when the Audit Commission takes over the work of the Benefit Fraud Inspectorate.

What do you think? You can leave your comments below.

The full article contains 289 words and appears in Scarborough Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 March 2008 8:27 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Society out of Control,

Scarborough 12/03/2008 16:41:18
£35 MILLION!!!! I work hard and pay a lot of taxes. I save for my retirement. I pay for my own house, currently nearly £1000 per month. I then have bills etc on top. I pay for prescriptions. I pay for school dinners. WHAT A MUG I AM. My wife and I have seriously discussed giving up work and claiming benefits. We would be no worse off and have free time all day every day. We are in well paid jobs, bringing in about £50000 a year between us. Why should we bother? Claimants should be made to conduct unpaid work in the community. Everybody would benefit.
2

castle crusader.,

scarborough 13/03/2008 08:47:43
So with almost a thousand pound a week in your pocket you would advocate that the sick, disabled, seasonal workers and senior citizens are sent to the workhouse on a daily basis, no wonder this country is in the state it is in with selfish, self centered people like you, perhaps you should become a councillor thinking only of your selves at least you would be among friends
3

Society out of Control,

14/03/2008 07:53:38
Castle crusadar has got the wrong end of the stick. Obviously there are some people who should be looked after because they have no other means of support. What I am talking about are the situations where there is no obvious reason for the lack of employment apart from laziness. There is crap about no jobs but when I was a student I went to the job centre daily and got 3 jobs to run at the same time just to pay off some debts. The problem is the benefit system does not encourage people to work because they are better off not working in a lot of cases. This would benefit everybody because there would be less of a burden on the social security bill allowing more investment in hospitals, education etc. Taxes could be lowered allowing more disposable income which can then be spent therby creating more jobs. The arguements go on and on. The true systeme of looking after everybody was communism. Look how well that worked and that was probably the most corrupt system of all!!
4

castle crusader.,

scarborough 14/03/2008 09:11:16
Well at least an attempt to justify your badly floored argument.

Out of interest and needing information for an article on the number of jobless in Sca In Jan 08 I contact the local Job Centre Plus apart from the information on the number of jobless I also found out there was only 1 vacancy on there books which was part time and at the minimum wage.

As for the burden on the social security bill you suggest more could be spent on hospitals and education and I will agree, however education in your case has failed you miserably or are you just thick, crusader, thereby, arguments and system these are all the correct spellings unlike the ones in your article.

Now lets get to the nitty-gritty of your argument 'taxes could be lowered' So this is what you are really griping about, well sir let me tell you I have worked for 50 years to bring up my family paying tax and everything else required but without complaint as to who gets what, did your parents get family allowance for you, were you educated by the state, did you pay privately for the birth of your children, do you not use the NHS? stop moaning you have had your share in the past and no doubt will continue do so in the future.

In conclusion you refer to communism, The vast majority of us prefer to call it the welfare state and if you advocate dismantling this wonderful system to get yourself lower taxes may god save us from you and your ilk.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.