Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Stay in Scarborough

Concerns at new mobile phone mast - COMMENT ON THIS STORY

View Video
Download Video

Video

Video showing what happens to raw popcorn by just sending a mobile phone signal
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 November 2008
A worried mother has voiced her fears about a planned Scarborough mobile phone mast which she claims could pose a health risk.
Mother-of-three Jennifer Adams, 45, raised her concerns after Scarborough Council gave planning permission for a 50ft Vodafone mast at the junction of Stepney Road and Stepney Drive.

Mrs Adams, of Stepney Road, fears that the transmissions given off by the mast may not only prove dangerous to her family but also students at the nearby Scarborough Sixth Form College and the residents of Combe Hay House, the George Edward Smart care home for the elderly.

She said: "I cannot believe planning permission has been given despite objections from residents, the college and the care home.

"There seems to be no proof one way or another whether the transmissions are dangerous, but there is anecdotal evidence, and that is enough to worry me.

"I am concerned for the safety of my children who will be living so close to it, and also for the town's teenagers who attend the college. Also, it is going to be fairly prominent and not terribly attractive."

Elaine Heritage, head of home at Combe Hay House, in Stepney Drive, has raised her own concerns with the council.

She said: "What can you do when you are up against the council and they say their decision is final? It is like being up against a brick wall.

"There are all these talks about what the aerials give off, it is worrying that it is going up here as we have a lot of vulnerable people.

"The elderly and the young are usually most affected healthwise.

"I don't think they are the sort of thing that should be put up in residential areas."

Green Party councillor Dilys Cluer said legislation surrounding the planning process of such masts would not involve the application going before the planning committee and, as long as the company erecting the mast can provide the necessary paperwork, no objections can be made on health grounds.

She said: "The Green Party has definite doubts about these things and we are very concerned about them going up in Scarborough. I don't like them but there is not much that can be done."

Initial work has already begun at the proposed site for the mast, which is expected to reach around 15 metres (49ft) tall.

Rob Matthews, a spokesman for Vodafone, said: "We recognise that some communities have concerns about the deployment of our base stations. We take these concerns very seriously. All our base stations are designed, built, and operated in accordance with stringent national exposure guidelines which have the formal backing of independent bodies, such as the World Health Organisation.

"Typical exposures from our base stations will be hundreds if not thousands of times below the guidelines."



What do you think? Email us: letters@scarborougheveningnews.co.uk

Write to: Evening News, Aberdeen Walk, Scarborough, Y011 1BB.

Text us: Text the word SENEDITOR and send with your message to 81800 (25p charge plus standard national rate. See terms in Public Notices)

Join the website Forum debate at www.scarborougheveningnews.co.uk

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 November 2008 10:01 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
2
1

Against Bereaurcracy.,

26/11/2008 10:18:04
So SBC give it the go ahead, Green Party councillor Dilys Cluer says "you cannot object to it on health grounds".

OK, so object again on the grounds it is an ugly eyesore and not in keeping with the surrounding area.

Or once again were objectors not told about this method of objecting?.
2

English like wot she is meant to be spoke,

26/11/2008 10:19:47
Phone masts - the passive smoking of the 21st century.

All power to your elbow Ms Adams.
3

Amaroo,

Scarborough 26/11/2008 10:22:53
Maybe someone can answer the simple question.

Why do these masts that 'could' cause health problems, always seem to be sited near a school ?.
4

J Elliott,

26/11/2008 11:41:20
On the contrary 80% of WHO research proves that this technology is not safe. Over 2000 independent studies, linking phone mast electro magnetic radiation with serious ill health including cancer, confirm that phone masts should not be sited within 350 metres of schools or housing.

The industry international guideline smokescreen that attempts to persuade us that mast microwave emissions are safe is a con. These international guidelines were only designed for one thing. To protect the Industry and their profits! The ICNIRP international guidelines, trumpeted by government and phone operators as providing protection to the general public from phone mast electro magnetic radiation emissions, were introduced in 1992 in the technology's infancy. They were introduced not by scientists, but by technicians. They completely ignored researching the most damaging effects to the human body of these radiation emissions, i.e. measuring the biological, vibrational effects on the human body and damage to cells. They only researched the thermal (heating) effects of the emissions on dead meat! This absurdity is all that stands between us and the risk of life threatening or chronic disease. These (ICNIRP) guidelines as 'protection' are equivalent to a fireguard in front of a defective gas fire that is emitting carbon monoxide - it might stop you getting burned but you might not be alive to care!

5

badger464,

26/11/2008 11:52:42
ahh, the real reason for global warming the vast amount of microwave transmissions that are flooding our planet, if you put something in a microwave oven it gets hot so why shouldn't the planet get hotter when you bombard it with the same, carbon footprinting is a scam
6

Shrek,

26/11/2008 12:36:33
Most of us have a mobile phone, and if truth be known l known of us want one in our back yard.

However, surely a more suitable place is either further up the hill on Jacobs mount, Stepney road, or why not at the top of Sandybed near the allotments/farm
7

Shrek,

26/11/2008 15:33:27
sorry about mistakes above

Most of us have a mobile phone, and if truth be known most of us wouldn't want one in our back yard.

However, surely a more suitable place is either further up the hill on Jacobs mount, Stepney road, or why not at the top of Sandybed near the allotments/farm
8

Amaroo,

Scarborough 26/11/2008 15:52:01
We have the elaborate technical explanation but the simple question I asked was, why do they always seem to be erected near or adjacent to a school ?.

Anyone know ?
9

coldupnorth,

Scarborough 26/11/2008 18:02:51
What the story fails to mention is the fact Vodafone have failed to follow strict government planning guidelines (contained in PPG8)which insist that they consult with schools near to proposed masts. Council documents, available on line, show that no such consultation was made with the Sixth Form College or St Augustines RC school - it was deemed "not applicable". They have tried to keep the development a secret from those most affected - presumably in the hope of preventing another public outcry - similar to many they have faced in numerous other locations across the country.
10

Dennis Curley,

Scarborough 26/11/2008 22:53:22
There is a phone mast attached to the top of the North Stand scoreboard at Scarborough Cricket Club's ground on North Marine Road, which is effectively on my back yard. As far as I am aware, there was no consultation with local residents prior to its installation, which was some time ago. No doubt The Council and Scarborough Cricket Club were remunerated for this placement (probably ongoing in the case of the Cricket Club in the form of an annual payment). Personally, I am not convinced of the health dangers provided by these masts, but as a courtesy to all the residents in this area, both the Council and Scarborough Cricket Club should at least have informed of its presence.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.