Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Stay in Scarborough

Easy answer to Knipe Point

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 June 2009
RE the £20 million cost of stabilising the cliff edge at knipe point (Evening News, June 17).
There is still no guarantee this will work in the long run. Instead of wasting yet more tax payers' money and awarding non-local businesses contracts to do this work, the easiest solution is as follows.

1 Obtain a compulsory purchase order for all
the 56 bungalows.

2 Demolish every one of them, and clean up the site.

3 Let nature take its course.

This type of erosion has been happening for years and with the weight of the houses built by the edge of a cliff this has speeded up the process considerably.

Although it is devastating for residents to lose their homes like this, like a local resident said, they can't sell, move or remortgage etc.

Surely it doesn't take an accountant to work out that 56 bungalows at an average cost of £180,000 each is only £10.8 million as opposed to £20 million.

It is likely to cost around £2 million to clean up the site and plant trees, which in time will stabilise the ground with their root systems.

It's about time Scarborough Council stopped pussyfooting around wasting time and money, with no real leadership to have the guts to make an important decision and help these residents out by doing the most economical, environmentally friendly solution.

This would also boost the local business economy if they have the brains to award the work to local firms.

After all, it was the council in its wisdom which gave planning permission for the houses to be built in the first place.

So, come on councillors, do the most economical and sensible thing that you have done for this town in decades and make a proper decision.

Ian Kevan
Prospect Crescent
Scarborough




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 June 2009 8:38 AM
  • Source: Scarborough Evening News
  • Location: Scarborough
 
Prev
1
Next
1

heavensentmum,

22/06/2009 12:42:17
£180.000 each, In this economic climate. Has Ian Kevan got a relative who owns one?
2

Shrek,

23/06/2009 00:15:01
More like £140k normally and certainly not worth that now given the state of ground now

Whats wrong with insurance paying up

The tax payer shouldnt pay it wasnt our fault they were built on unstable ground

The council have got tuppence, they cant even afford to do futurist up or the stupid scheme for open air theatre
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.